Evita Peron Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Evita Peron - Essay Example She was the wife of Argentine president Juan Peron from 1946 to 1952 when she succumbed to cancer. Evita is considered as one of the most powerful women during the 1940s to 1950s; an era which was characterized by serious discrimination of women in different societies. Being the only woman with power to question and to rule during those times automatically rendered her much fame compared to other women. Other researches by Historians reveal that she was more powerful than male leaders, her husband inclusive. Fraser and Navarro, in their book, Evita: the Real Life of Eva Peron, explore the life of Eva from her birth in Argentina, Los Toldos 1919 May, 17 to the time of her death and burial as a First Lady, the wife of the Argentine leader (Nicholas & Navarro 94). Eva’s actions and steps give vivid review of the kind of a woman she was during her time. The first reason that shows that the woman had more power than other women and some men in the society is the issue of the Nazi a nd Argentina relationship during the cold war. Eva offered hiding places, in Argentina, to the Nazi people. This is an indication of the power the woman had. She managed to influence most of the Argentine government, including her husband to allow the Nazis hide within their territory. This implies her daring and brave character of taking risks. It was obvious that the Nazi enemies would have reacted by waging war against them, in case they discovered their decision. The end of the Second World War initiated and triggered powerful democratic tides on the street in different cities such as Buenos Aires threatening to Swamp Peron (Fraser and Navarro 34). The book reveals that Peron’s soldiers became angry because of his excess or total dependence on his wife for support; they forced him to resign because of this. This, analyzed, portrayed the amount of power that the woman had. She had a lot of influence on her husband, making the soldiers become angry (Nicholas & Navarro 34). The anger by the soldiers was due to the tradition that women had less power compared to their male counterparts. Their beliefs and stereotyping of women as powerless individuals forced them to terminate the closeness of the president to his wife. They went ahead and forced him to resign from the seat of vice presidency. Eva, seeing this, took the opportunity and used her persuasion power to rally support for her husband calling for his allies or friends in the worker’s union, military, and the police department. This led to riots in Casa Rosada giving the couple leeway to flee the city (Nicholas & Navarro 43). The navy discovered their hidden cottage and went to arrest them. Eva, on seeing this, went out of furiously out of control with anger and rage, and forced them to take away her husband, but left her behind. The reason why they left her had been the question and the debate of many Historians in Europe and the entire globe. Reliable and trustworthy sources like Fraser a nd Navarro, in their book, state an interpretation of this that it was the strange ego and brevity of the woman that scared them. Others would ask why they decided to take the husband. Was the husband not strong enough to defend himself? From the above illustrations, it is evident and undoubtedly true that Evita is exercising charismatic type of authority on the people. Her authority and power is not only derived from her position in the Argentine government as the First Lady, but also from her brevity and daring nature. The action of facing the soldiers with anger and fury is an indication that she is a brave woman who is ready to approach the male soldiers without fear. Besides, she is the only woman in the entire Argentina who has shown a lot of power and influence on the governance and ruling of her husband. Rational

19th century Romanticism in France Research Paper

19th century Romanticism in France - Research Paper Example He bathes himself in the emotional zeal and beliefs of the French Revolution and greatly admires Napoleon Bonaparte. He outwardly professes to be a monarchist all the while secretly reading Rousseau’s Confessions by candle light. For Stendhal then, Sorel serves as a means of expressing the pain many French Romantic thinkers and writers felt when trying to reconcile the lofty ideals of the eighteenth century Enlightenment with the realities of the French Revolution. It is important to recall that throughout the eighteenth century France was the philosophical heart and soul of the Enlightenment. Its language was most often the preferred prose for its expression. French after all was the language of Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, and Condorcet (among others). In their ideas, however, there already developed a troubling dichotomy: the belief that science could answer any question and that man, if he so chose, could better himself using that same science. The eighteenth century’s â€Å"rising middle class proclaimed new political ideas: democracy and patriotism. It had a new conception of morality: civic virtue and heroism† (Antal 1935, p. 160). The Enlightenment sought to apply science and â€Å"rationalize† every part of society. Thus it was irrational for a king to have absolute power. It was rational for the people to determine things. If only the latter were the case then society’s ills would be no more. Of course the end result could not have been farther from these ideals: with the French King beheaded and the social order laying ruins, France of the 1790’s was the place of murder, mayhem, and inhumanity. The ideals of â€Å"liberty, fraternity, equality† were a mockery. And when Napoleon brought order he did so only after crowning himself emperor and thus demonstrated that order in France was only possible if there was a strong monarch. Stendhal was a believer in the French Revolution and himself